As climber dies in Rocky Mountain National Park, searchers conduct training near Holy Cross
The latest tragedy, according to the Denver Post, occurred between Taylor Peak and Powell Peak in Rocky Mountain National Park. It was the fifth fatal fall in the park this year, and it underscores a growing trend of accidents and fatalities in Colorado's high country, where more people are taking more risks and there have been 11, possibly 12, deaths on or near Colorado fourteeners (peaks over 14,000 feet) this year.
The deaths and disappearances have also rekindled the decades-old debate about personal responsibility and risk-taking versus taxpayer-funded search and rescue efforts. Most SAR organizations are volunteer operations, but sheriff's officials, park service employees and – in the case of the lost Holy Cross hiker – Colorado Army National Guard helicopters -- are brought in to aid volunteer searchers.
In the Holy Cross case, a well-supplied and somewhat experienced Chicago-area hiker decided to try a circuitous 25-mile route that included trying for the summit of 14,005-foot Mount of the Holy Cross. Nearly 50 search and rescue volunteers from five different SAR organizations looked for James Nelson for more than four days, logging in excess of 1,000 hours.
Nelson did not have a cell phone on his week-long hike, and after several days it would have lost power anyway, and in many places would not have had service. Still, posters on different climbing blogs have questioned Nelson's judgment, and backcountry experts advise never travelling alone in a wilderness area, where a twisted ankle can be fatal.
The Holy Cross case conjured memories of a Lakewood woman, Michelle Vanek, who went missing on Mount of the Holy Cross in 2005, as well as other lost hikers and disappearances on the mysterious mountain with a cross of snow that forms in the summer. Posters on climbing sites have been talking about the “Holy Cross Triangle.”
The Eagle County Sheriff's Office called off the search for Nelson at midnight Tuesday, although a multi-county search and rescue training operation took place in the Holy Cross Wilderness Area on Saturday.
“The focus of this training is to teach teams how to work together and the best practices when searching conducting an intensive search of a small area on foot,” according to a release from the Eagle County Sheriff's Office. Earlier in the week, the sheriff had said SAR groups would look for clues to the disappearance of Nelson during regular training operations in the area.
Vail Mountain Rescue Group, the Salvation Army, Alpine Rescue Team, Douglas County Search and Rescue, Summit County Search and Rescue, Mesa County Search and Rescue, Freemont County Search and Rescue, and Grand County Search and Rescue participated in Saturday's training exercise.
Saturday's training, according to the Denver Post, was going on near Vail on the same day a 54-year-old Colorado resident climbing with two others on Taylor Glacier in Rocky Mountain National Park fell and slid 350 feet to his death. Park rangers were working today to recover his body.
A later Post story reported the man had been identified as James Charles Patrick, a plumber from Littleton, and that he "tumbled 1,000 feet" down the glacier, taking a climbing rope with him when he fell and stranding his two climbing partners, who were later rescued. The paper reported Patrick's body was airlifted out today.
4 Comments on "As climber dies in Rocky Mountain National Park, searchers conduct training near Holy Cross"
jenn – Oct. 24, 2010, at 11:03 p.m.
travelot4...I think the article meant personal responsibility versus all volunteer search and rescue teams. All the teams I know in Colorado are 100% volunteer and do not get any tax payer funds. So when people get into trouble in the backcountry, and we go out to help, it does come into play that we are risking our lives to help someone else because that is what we do. Its when folks put themselves at risk unnecessarily that spurs the debate.
travelot4 – Oct. 26, 2010, at 2:55 p.m.
Jenn, I think we are on the same page actually. The article stated that the search brought up the debate again. That's all.
I hike in the mountains of Wyoming and here too, the searchers are volunteers. I'm just saying if tax paid searches occur, that's okay in my book. Getting lost on a hike can happen to the best of us and we depend on each other to survive. I pay taxes for your schools etc. and for search efforts to find you if you're lost on the trail. I'm glad to do it and hope you would do the same for me.
jenn – Oct. 26, 2010, at 11:31 p.m.
Oh yes, I would completely agree with you. It is our passion to assist people who need our services. Being an all volunteer organization, we rely on donations and fundraisers to keep us up and running. The best way to support search and rescue teams is to purchase a hunting/fishing license or a CORSAR card or donate to your local team. Be safe!
travelot4 – Oct. 18, 2010, at 6:31 p.m.
I don't understand the debate regarding personal responsibity vs taxpayer funded seach and rescue efforts. That's our country's system - we all collectively pay taxes so that a few don't have to foot the bill. If you take a risk and drive too fast and crash your car, should we not send the ambulance to rescue you? If you burn your house down while playing with fireworks, should we not send the fire department to put out the blaze? One cannot expect to get equal value from our tax money - sometimes I will get the benefit and sometimes it will be you. We all pay state and local taxes for education right? Well, If I don't have any children to educate, am I exempt from paying that tax? Of course not. Someone else paid taxes so you could go to school. Now it's time for you to pay someone elses kid's way.
I am just happy she was found alive and well. She didn't intend to get lost anymore than people intend to crack up their cars, or burn down their homes.